Skip to content
This site is deprecated. See the new version.

Long-term Lock-in

📋Page Status
Page Type:AI Transition ModelStyle Guide →Structured factor/scenario/parameter page
Last edited:2026-01-03 (5 months ago)
Words:112
Structure:
📊 1📈 0🔗 3📚 0•11%Score: 4/15
Issues (1):
  • StaleLast edited 164 days ago - may need review
ATM Scenario

Long-term Lock-in

Model RoleDegradation Scenario
Primary DriversAI Ownership, Civilizational Competence
Sub-scenariosValues lock-in, Power lock-in, Epistemic lock-in

Long-term Lock-in refers to scenarios where AI enables the permanent entrenchment of certain conditions - whether values, power structures, or epistemic environments. Unlike acute catastrophes, lock-in may unfold gradually and may not be immediately recognized as harmful.

Loading diagram...
ScoreFactorNote
85↑ AI OwnershipOwnership patterns directly shape what gets locked in
80↑ AI UsesWhere AI is deployed determines what structures get entrenched
75↔ Civilizational CompetenceHigh competence could enable good or bad lock-in
70↑ AI CapabilitiesMore capable AI makes lock-in scenarios more feasible
60↑ Misalignment PotentialMisaligned AI could lock in bad values or power structures
40↑ Transition TurbulenceCrisis can entrench emergency powers and structures
35↑ Misuse PotentialMisuse could trigger authoritarian responses

Unlike other scenarios, lock-in is not inherently negative:

PoleDescription
PositiveBeneficial values and institutions stabilized, protected from degradation
NegativeAuthoritarian control, harmful ideologies, or stagnation permanently entrenched

Long-term Lock-in primarily affects:

  • Long-term Trajectory: The quality and character of the post-transition future
  • May contribute to Existential Catastrophe if lock-in prevents course correction