Content Quality Dashboard

This dashboard provides an overview of content quality, staleness tracking, and entity relationship health across the knowledge base.

Summary Statistics

315

Total Entities

Risks

Responses

Models

4.4

Avg Quality

Gaps Found

Quality Distribution

Unrated

Stub

Draft

Adequate

111

Good

171

Excellent

Low Quality (1-2)

Needs significant improvement

Adequate (3)

Meets basic standards

High Quality (4-5)

282

Well-developed content

Average Quality Score4.4 / 5.0

Content by Type

Type	Count
model	78
risk	54
researcher	28
parameter	22
policy	21
concept	15
crux	12
capability	11
metric	10
scenario	10
intervention	9
organization	8
safety-agenda	8
risk-factor	7
lab-research	6
historical	5
argument	4
lab	4
analysis	1
resource	1
lab-academic	1

Entity	Last Updated
Carlsmith's Six-Premise Argument	2026-01
International Coordination	2025-12
Societal Trust	2025-12
Epistemic Health	2025-12
Information Authenticity	2025-12
AI Control Concentration	2025-12
Human Agency	2025-12
Economic Stability	2025-12
Human Expertise	2025-12
Human Oversight Quality	2025-12

Entity Gaps

Risks Without Responses

These risks don’t have any response pages linking to them:

Misalignment Potential (risk-factor)
Misuse Potential (risk-factor)
AI Capabilities (risk-factor)
AI Uses (risk-factor)
AI Ownership (risk-factor)
Civilizational Competence (risk-factor)
Transition Turbulence (risk-factor)
AI Authoritarian Tools (risk)
Autonomous Weapons (risk)
Cyber Psychosis (risk)
...and 14 more

Responses Without Risk Links

These response pages don’t link to any risks:

AI Safety Institutes (AISIs) (policy)
Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (policy)
Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) (policy)
China AI Regulatory Framework (policy)
Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (policy)
Compute Thresholds (policy)
Compute Monitoring (policy)
International Compute Regimes (policy)
EU AI Act (policy)
US AI Chip Export Controls (policy)
...and 14 more

Orphaned Entities

These entities have no incoming or outgoing links:

Misaligned Catastrophe - The Bad Ending (scenario)
Slow Takeoff Muddle - Muddling Through (scenario)
Aligned AGI - The Good Ending (scenario)
Multipolar Competition - The Fragmented World (scenario)
Pause and Redirect - The Deliberate Path (scenario)
Is AI Existential Risk Real? (crux)
Open vs Closed Source AI (crux)
Should We Pause AI Development? (crux)
When Will AGI Arrive? (crux)
Government Regulation vs Industry Self-Governance (crux)
...and 28 more

Enhancement Queue

Pages prioritized for improvement based on (importance - quality × 10). High importance + low quality = priority target for enhancement.

Page	Quality	Importance	Gap	Category
Carlsmith's Six-Premise Argument	4	90	86	models
Alignment Robustness Trajectory	68	80	12	models
Parameter Interaction Network	70	75	5	models
Bioweapons	78	82	4	risks
Lock-in	78	82	4	risks
Multipolar Trap	78	82	4	risks
Irreversibility Threshold Model	71	74	3	models
Agentic AI	78	80	2	capabilities
Why Alignment Might Be Hard	80	82	2	debates
Deep Learning Revolution (2012-2020)	42	44	2	history
Critical Uncertainties Model	80	82	2	models
Safety Culture Equilibrium	70	72	2	models
Regulatory Capacity Threshold Model	68	70	2	models
Compute Monitoring	80	82	2	responses
Reward Hacking	80	81	1	risks

To enhance these pages, run:

node scripts/document-enhancer.mjs enhance --min-imp 30 --max-qual 3 --limit 10

Link Health

1254

Total Links

1254

Valid Links

Broken Links

100%

Health Score

To get current link health status, run:

npm run validate:links

Running Validation

To run the full validation suite locally:

npm run validate

Individual validators:

npm run validate:style       # Style guide compliance
npm run validate:staleness   # Content freshness
npm run validate:consistency # Cross-page consistency
npm run validate:data        # Entity data integrity
npm run validate:links       # Internal link validation